<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Impressive Argument Against OpenID</title> <atom:link href="http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/impressive-argument-against-openid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/impressive-argument-against-openid/</link> <description>Because We Can</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Amber S</title><link>http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/impressive-argument-against-openid/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link> <dc:creator>Amber S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:28:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/?p=251#comment-999</guid> <description>We can only hope something better comes along. And we have to hope its not Google taking over the world.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can only hope something better comes along. And we have to hope its not Google taking over the world.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kim Jackson</title><link>http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/impressive-argument-against-openid/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link> <dc:creator>Kim Jackson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:34:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/?p=251#comment-998</guid> <description>I like the article. I also read Warpspire&#039;s reasons for not using OpenID. Your post and his made me rethink some of the lectures I attended in college, I remember back in college that the words &quot;pervasive&quot; and &quot;ubiquitous&quot; were the computer science buzzwords.  And that was all I thought they were at the time; buzzwords that would be replaced the next year by new ones.  My assumption seemed to be correct at the time.  But now &quot;social media&quot; and &quot;web 2.0&quot; are the new buzzwords and they do not seem to be going away anytime soon.  And to me these buzzwords are eerily similar to pervasive and ubiquitous computing.  Everyone wants multiple ways to be interconnected.  I think solutions like OpenID naturally lend themselves to this type of distributed social networking environment.  I agree that the implementation is not the best, but as more players enter the scene the better implementations will rise to the top.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the article. I also read Warpspire&#39;s reasons for not using OpenID. Your post and his made me rethink some of the lectures I attended in college, I remember back in college that the words &#8220;pervasive&#8221; and &#8220;ubiquitous&#8221; were the computer science buzzwords.  And that was all I thought they were at the time; buzzwords that would be replaced the next year by new ones.  My assumption seemed to be correct at the time.  But now &#8220;social media&#8221; and &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; are the new buzzwords and they do not seem to be going away anytime soon.  And to me these buzzwords are eerily similar to pervasive and ubiquitous computing.  Everyone wants multiple ways to be interconnected.  I think solutions like OpenID naturally lend themselves to this type of distributed social networking environment.  I agree that the implementation is not the best, but as more players enter the scene the better implementations will rise to the top.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amber S</title><link>http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/impressive-argument-against-openid/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link> <dc:creator>Amber S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:28:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/?p=251#comment-954</guid> <description>We can only hope something better comes along. And we have to hope its not Google taking over the world.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can only hope something better comes along. And we have to hope its not Google taking over the world.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kim Jackson</title><link>http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/impressive-argument-against-openid/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link> <dc:creator>Kim Jackson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:34:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thesimiandowntimeanalyst.com/?p=251#comment-695</guid> <description>I like the article. I also read Warpspire&#039;s reasons for not using OpenID. Your post and his made me rethink some of the lectures I attended in college, I remember back in college that the words &quot;pervasive&quot; and &quot;ubiquitous&quot; were the computer science buzzwords.  And that was all I thought they were at the time; buzzwords that would be replaced the next year by new ones.  My assumption seemed to be correct at the time.  But now &quot;social media&quot; and &quot;web 2.0&quot; are the new buzzwords and they do not seem to be going away anytime soon.  And to me these buzzwords are eerily similar to pervasive and ubiquitous computing.  Everyone wants multiple ways to be interconnected.  I think solutions like OpenID naturally lend themselves to this type of distributed social networking environment.  I agree that the implementation is not the best, but as more players enter the scene the better implementations will rise to the top.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the article. I also read Warpspire&#39;s reasons for not using OpenID. Your post and his made me rethink some of the lectures I attended in college, I remember back in college that the words &#8220;pervasive&#8221; and &#8220;ubiquitous&#8221; were the computer science buzzwords.  And that was all I thought they were at the time; buzzwords that would be replaced the next year by new ones.  My assumption seemed to be correct at the time.  But now &#8220;social media&#8221; and &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; are the new buzzwords and they do not seem to be going away anytime soon.  And to me these buzzwords are eerily similar to pervasive and ubiquitous computing.  Everyone wants multiple ways to be interconnected.  I think solutions like OpenID naturally lend themselves to this type of distributed social networking environment.  I agree that the implementation is not the best, but as more players enter the scene the better implementations will rise to the top.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/15 queries in 0.035 seconds using disk

Served from: box391.bluehost.com @ 2010-03-12 23:39:41 -->